← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Emmons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-09-14 Country: USA
Bentley
Verbal AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 55 1 4 5 0.091 0.0334 0.0356 0.0961 0.1023
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 45 6 20 26 0.578 0.2123 0.2149 0.6107 0.6181
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 39 1 15 16 0.410 0.2420 0.2226 1.2312 1.1323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Bentley D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7173
Defenseman overall
#1706
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Bentley Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2014-15
0.13
actual FR PPG at Bentley
BCHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Bentley
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Bentley
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bentley

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2014-15
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.