IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Farrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Governors Academy NE-Prep 28 4 10 14 0.500 0.1411 0.1411 0.2288 0.2288
2022-23 Governors Academy NE-Prep 27 5 16 21 0.778 0.2194 0.2194 0.3559 0.3559
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 47 0 11 11 0.234 0.0872 0.0856 0.3410 0.3349
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 50 4 9 13 0.260 0.0969 0.0903 0.3788 0.3529
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA — 24 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13895
Defenseman overall
#2772
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincenzo Renda
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Jackson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Egan Schmitt
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.