← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luca Rea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 North York Rangers OJHL 1 1 1 2 2.000 0.4902 0.4902 1.3754 1.3754
2020-21 Pickering Panthers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 North York Rangers OJHL 52 18 25 43 0.827 0.2027 0.2076 0.5687 0.5826
2022-23 OJHL 46 10 27 37 0.804 0.1971 0.1918 0.5531 0.5383
2023-24 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 55 17 28 45 0.818 0.2005 0.1847 0.5627 0.5184
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 25 5 3 8 0.320
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast 21 2 7 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Plymouth State
+167.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21954
Forward overall
#1151
Forward born in 2003
#935
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.