← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Orysiuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 51 0 7 7 0.137 0.0461 0.0519 0.1271 0.1432
2014-15 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 34 2 7 9 0.265 0.0888 0.0953 0.2450 0.2631
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 43 1 7 8 0.186 0.0683 0.0714 0.1963 0.2053
2016-17 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 60 6 20 26 0.433 0.1592 0.1579 0.4573 0.4534
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 60 13 26 39 0.650 0.2388 0.2250 0.6861 0.6464
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bentley D1 AHA SR 26 5 7 12 0.462
2020-21 Bentley D1 AHA JR 16 1 6 7 0.438
2019-20 Bentley D1 AHA SO 33 1 4 5 0.151
2018-19 Bentley D1 AHA FR 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2018-19 · Bentley
+109.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7370
Defenseman overall
#1366
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2011-12
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.