← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikita Silyutin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-11-17 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Akademiya SKA St. Petersburg MHL-RU 23 1 4 5 0.217 0.1106 0.1245 0.5825 0.6555
2025-26 MHL-RU 47 11 7 18 0.383 0.1948 0.2136 1.0262 1.1250
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26677
Forward overall
#405
Forward born in 2008
#913
in MHL-RU

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.