← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Fryer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-23 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Victoria Royals WHL 9 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Victoria Royals WHL 57 1 6 7 0.123 0.0597 0.0630 0.3013 0.3180
2024-25 Victoria Royals WHL 67 1 12 13 0.194 0.0944 0.0946 0.4760 0.4770
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 62 2 7 9 0.145 0.0706 0.0675 0.3563 0.3405
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21208
Defenseman overall
#3435
Defenseman born in 2006
#1645
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.20
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.