← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake USHS-MN 27 3 11 14 0.518 0.0656 0.0656 0.1259 0.1259
2020-21 Prior Lake USHS-MN 19 2 12 14 0.737 0.0933 0.0933 0.1790 0.1790
2021-22 Eau Claire North (Wis.) USHS-MN 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 50 4 15 19 0.380 0.1396 0.1445
2023-24 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 36 5 16 21 0.583 0.2143 0.2115 0.6157 0.6077
2024-25 Surrey Eagles BCHL 43 8 19 27 0.628 0.2419 0.2219 0.9138 0.8382
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 32 2 6 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Alaska Fairbanks
+21.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6006
Defenseman overall
#1477
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2024-25
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.