IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Cavalieri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Toronto Patriots OJHL 43 5 12 17 0.395 0.1187 0.1260 0.2706 0.2872
2009-10 Ajax Attack OJHL 45 8 10 18 0.400 0.1202 0.1213 0.2738 0.2762
2010-11 — OJHL 27 4 11 15 0.556 0.1669 0.1606 0.3803 0.3659
2011-12 — OJHL 48 11 20 31 0.646 0.1940 0.1781 0.4421 0.4059
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 23 6 9 15 0.652
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 23 9 5 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+315.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33435
Forward overall
#1160
Forward born in 1991
#2296
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Gauld
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Mecrones
New England · 2016-17
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Rimbach
St. Olaf · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.