← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keets Fawcett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-23 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Calgary Hitmen WHL 65 19 26 45 0.692 0.3368 0.3499 1.6911 1.7571
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 63 10 16 26 0.413 0.2008 0.1979 1.0081 0.9936
2025-26 Regina Pats WHL 56 30 29 59 1.054 0.5126 0.4815 2.5736 2.4174
2026-27 Regina Pats WHL 4 4 2 6 1.500 0.7298 0.7298 3.6640 3.6640
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10890
Forward overall
#389
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
WHL 2023-24
0.61
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.