← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keets Fawcett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-23 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Calgary Hitmen WHL 65 19 26 45 0.692 0.3368 0.3499 1.6987 1.7650
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 63 10 16 26 0.413 0.2008 0.1979 1.0126 0.9980
2025-26 Regina Pats WHL 56 30 29 59 1.054 0.5126 0.4815 2.5852 2.4283
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10685
Forward overall
#378
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2023-24
0.22
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
AJHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
AJHL 2020-21
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
QMJHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.