← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Verdon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-07 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0409 0.0454 0.2224 0.2469
2022-23 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 67 21 25 46 0.687 0.3373 0.3580 1.8334 1.9461
2023-24 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 68 24 27 51 0.750 0.3685 0.3730 2.0027 2.0270
2024-25 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 64 20 37 57 0.891 0.4376 0.4214 2.3782 2.2902
2025-26 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 64 36 59 95 1.484 0.7293 0.6679 3.9638 3.6298
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4715
Forward overall
#113
Forward born in 2005
#132
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OHL 2024-25
0.50
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2023-24
0.28
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
QMJHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
WHL 2023-24
0.61
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.