IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Fiddler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-09 Country: USA
2025 · Round 2, Pick #36  ·  Seattle Kraken Seattle Kraken
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 63 5 10 15 0.238 0.1158 0.1283 0.5842 0.6471
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 64 10 23 33 0.516 0.2508 0.2644 1.2651 1.3337
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 63 11 25 36 0.571 0.2780 0.2802 1.4020 1.4131
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5226
Defenseman overall
#752
Defenseman born in 2007
#836
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Eric Jamieson
WHL 2023-24
0.42
actual FR PPG at Denver
Cale Ashcroft
USHL 2022-23
0.19
actual FR PPG at Denver
Adam Plant
BCHL 2013-14
0.25
actual FR PPG at Denver
Garrett Brown
USHL 2022-23
0.50
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.