IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Wideman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-07 Country: USA
2009 · Round 4, Pick #100  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally
Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 53 2 12 14 0.264 0.1559 0.1623 0.7935 0.8259
2020-21 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 59 9 32 41 0.695 1.7372 1.7372 9.5748 9.5748
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SR 41 4 20 24 0.585
2010-11 Miami D1 CCHA-orig JR 39 3 20 23 0.590
2009-10 Miami D1 NCHC SO 44 5 17 22 0.500
2008-09 Miami D1 NCHC FR 39 0 26 26 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2008-09 · Miami
+335.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#186
Defenseman overall
#62
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Hosmer
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.