← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Slobodian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-02 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 53 4 16 20 0.377 0.0726 0.0779
2024-25 Portland Winterhawks WHL 59 1 3 4 0.068 0.0330 0.0327 0.1664 0.1649
2025-26 Portland Winterhawks WHL 67 1 16 17 0.254 0.1234 0.1166 0.6225 0.5880
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18771
Defenseman overall
#3161
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.