← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daxon Rudolph Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-06 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 64 7 34 41 0.641 0.3115 0.3387 1.5636 1.6999
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 68 28 50 78 1.147 0.5577 0.5805 2.7998 2.9142
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#268
Defenseman overall
#46
Defenseman born in 2008
#276
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.