← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhett Sather Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-25 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Spokane Chiefs WHL 47 0 11 11 0.234 0.1138 0.1269 0.5742 0.6402
2025-26 Spokane Chiefs WHL 66 11 29 40 0.606 0.2949 0.3152 1.4872 1.5893
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5786
Defenseman overall
#374
Defenseman born in 2008
#883
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL-J20 2019-20
0.13
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
BCHL 2016-17
0.30
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
BCHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.