← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock England Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-08-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 3 2 1 3 1.000 0.4865 0.5645 2.4537 2.8470
2025-26 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 64 21 30 51 0.797 0.3877 0.4319 1.9554 2.1783
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9859
Forward overall
#22
Forward born in 2009
#346
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2016-17
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.