← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Calgary Canucks AJHL 1 0 3 3 3.000 1.0062 1.0827 2.7762 2.9873
2018-19 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 2 4 6 0.111 0.0428 0.0442 0.1617 0.1670
2019-20 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 58 14 15 29 0.500 0.1677 0.1677 0.4627 0.4627
2020-21 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 12 3 2 5 0.417 0.1699 0.1699
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 26 4 15 19 0.731
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 25 11 9 20 0.800
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 25 11 9 20 0.800
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 25 10 8 18 0.720
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2021-22 · Albertus Magnus
+83.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31946
Forward overall
#1617
Forward born in 2000
#1025
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.