← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Yard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-07-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Huntsville Otters OJHL 18 0 1 1 0.056 0.0155 0.0163 0.0384 0.0403
2005-06 Huntsville Otters OJHL 48 3 17 20 0.417 0.1164 0.1178 0.2876 0.2910
2006-07 Huntsville Otters OJHL 17 2 8 10 0.588 0.1643 0.1580 0.4059 0.3904
2007-08 Huntsville Otters OJHL 49 8 27 35 0.714 0.1996 0.1830 0.4929 0.4518
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 SR 21 2 9 11 0.524
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 JR 26 6 11 17 0.654
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 SO 25 4 17 21 0.840
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#5762
Defenseman overall
#946
Defenseman born in 1987
#2020
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2018-19
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.