IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Daneault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-23 Country: Canada
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0811 0.0887 0.4090 0.4473
2025-26 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 67 13 40 53 0.791 0.3848 0.4031 1.9409 2.0330
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11027
Forward overall
#123
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alex Jefferies
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.83
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Sami Tavernier
SM-Liiga-Jr 2014-15
0.50
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Nick Pierre
USHL 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Brett Seney
OJHL 2013-14
0.76
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.