IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Daneault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-23 Country: Canada
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0811 0.0887 0.4072 0.4454
2025-26 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 67 13 40 53 0.791 0.3848 0.4031 1.9322 2.0239
2026-27 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.4054 0.4054 2.0355 2.0355
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11224
Forward overall
#150
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alex Jefferies
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.83
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Devlin O'Brien
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Sami Tavernier
NAHL 2015-16
0.50
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Jordan Seyfert
USHL 2017-18
0.34
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.