IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michal Capos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-16 Country: Slovakia
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0350 0.0386 0.1006 0.1110
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 27 1 7 8 0.296 0.1441 0.1454 0.7238 0.7302
2026-27 Wenatchee Wild WHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1216 0.1216 0.6107 0.6107
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17228
Defenseman overall
#2209
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Grady Gallatin
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Cam Knuble
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Luke Witkowski
SHL 2025-26
0.19
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Alexander Calbeck
USHL 2025-26
0.24
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Caleb Suderman
Concordia · 2008-09
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Daniels
Westfield State · 2013-14
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.