IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michal Capos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-16 Country: Slovakia
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0350 0.0386 0.1005 0.1109
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 27 1 7 8 0.296 0.1441 0.1454 0.7270 0.7335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17029
Defenseman overall
#2154
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cam Knuble
USHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Colby Woogk
NAHL 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Luke Witkowski
SHL 2025-26
0.19
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Grady Gallatin
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Connolly
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Krill
Williams · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2007-08
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.