| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Ohio Blue Jackets | USHL | 58 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.224 | 0.1378 | 0.1453 | 0.6602 | 0.6959 |
| 2008-09 | Fargo Force | USHL | 55 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.400 | 0.2459 | 0.2482 | 1.1785 | 1.1895 |
| 2023-24 | Tappara | Liiga | 51 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.118 | 0.2940 | 0.1867 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Skellefteå AIK | SHL | 25 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.120 | 0.3000 | 0.1811 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Brynäs IF | SHL | 27 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.074 | 0.1852 | 0.1852 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Western Michigan | D1 | CCHA-orig | SR | 38 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.263 |
| 2011-12 | Western Michigan | D1 | CCHA-orig | JR | 40 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0.325 |
| 2010-11 | Western Michigan | D1 | CCHA-orig | SO | 42 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.214 |
| 2009-10 | Western Michigan | D1 | — | FR | 32 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.188 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.