← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Witkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-04-14 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Brynäs IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 58 3 10 13 0.224 0.1378 0.1453 0.6602 0.6959
2008-09 Fargo Force USHL 55 6 16 22 0.400 0.2459 0.2482 1.1785 1.1895
2023-24 Tappara Liiga 51 0 6 6 0.118 0.2940 0.1867
2024-25 Skellefteå AIK SHL 25 2 1 3 0.120 0.3000 0.1811
2025-26 Brynäs IF SHL 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.1852 0.1852
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SR 38 2 8 10 0.263
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig JR 40 2 11 13 0.325
2010-11 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SO 42 1 8 9 0.214
2009-10 Western Michigan D1 FR 32 2 4 6 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2009-10 · Western Michigan
-4.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4490
Defenseman overall
#826
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.