← New Search ↗ Social Card

Regen Cavanagh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0619 0.0663 0.1765 0.1891
2015-16 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 45 12 16 28 0.622 0.2310 0.2372 0.6588 0.6766
2016-17 USHL 55 8 15 23 0.418 0.2663 0.2508 1.2532 1.1802
2017-18 NAHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0928 0.0857 0.2647 0.2444
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC GR 29 12 19 31 1.069
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC SR 29 20 26 46 1.586
2020-21 Utica D3 UCHC JR 10 1 9 10 1.000
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC SO 25 10 10 20 0.800
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC FR 18 8 6 14 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2018-19 · Utica
+498.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16841
Forward overall
#693
Forward born in 1997
#1375
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2021-22
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.