IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Knuble Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 — USHL 25 2 1 3 0.120 0.0708 0.0754 0.3604 0.3841
2018-19 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 46 3 8 11 0.239 0.1410 0.1430 0.7181 0.7282
2019-20 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 46 3 3 6 0.130 0.0769 0.0769 0.3916 0.3916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 41 5 10 15 0.366
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 28 0 1 1 0.036
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 30 1 0 1 0.033
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17115
Defenseman overall
#2661
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2007-08
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Connolly
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillan Fox
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.