IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dillan Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 47 19 15 34 0.723 0.1773 0.1790 0.4952 0.4999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 26 9 13 22 0.846
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 9 15 24 0.923
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 20 9 11 20 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2012-13 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+552.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25538
Forward overall
#907
Forward born in 1991
#1213
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Schwartzmiller
Concordia (WI) · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Holland
Utica · 2016-17
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.