IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Schwartzmiller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wisconsin Whalers NA3HL 47 35 22 57 1.213 0.1461 0.1503 0.3831 0.3941
2019-20 Sheridan Hawks NA3HL 31 43 28 71 2.290 0.2760 0.2760 0.7235 0.7235
2020-21 Sheridan Hawks NA3HL 38 34 24 58 1.526 0.1839 0.1839 0.4822 0.4822
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC — 17 5 2 7 0.412
2021-22 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 17 5 2 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2021-22 · Concordia
+220.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19598
Forward overall
#617
Forward born in 2000
#149
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Heller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jacob Hetz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Maloney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie Page
Stonehill · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Neduzak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Dovey
Adrian · 2006-07
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.