IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Page Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 11 17 28 0.609 0.1306 0.1376 0.2981 0.3142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Stonehill D2 NE10 SR 28 7 12 19 0.679
2020-21 Stonehill D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Stonehill D2 NE10 SO 29 11 7 18 0.621
2018-19 Stonehill D2 NE10 FR 26 9 8 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2018-19 · Stonehill
+455.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31322
Forward overall
#1393
Forward born in 1999
#685
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Heller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Maloney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jacob Hetz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Taff
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Johnson
Saint Mary's · 2012-13
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Moodie
Skidmore · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.