← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-08 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Texas Tornado NAHL 58 11 11 22 0.379 0.1394 0.1506 0.4004 0.4327
2007-08 NAHL 52 32 29 61 1.173 0.4310 0.4446 1.2382 1.2772
2008-09 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 55 22 26 48 0.873 0.5148 0.4978 2.6211 2.5343
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig 5 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig 0 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8018
Forward overall
#299
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2024-25
0.72
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
QMJHL 2023-24
0.94
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2018-19
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.