← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cristophe Tellier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 53 10 20 30 0.566 0.2181 0.2235 0.8237 0.8443
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 28 43 71 1.224 0.4716 0.4716 1.7814 1.7814
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 53 22 32 54 1.019 0.6010 0.6010 3.0602 3.0602
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 36 5 13 18 0.500
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC GR 39 7 19 26 0.667
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 37 8 14 22 0.595
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 13 0 3 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2021-22 · Quinnipiac
+20.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6358
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2003-04
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2002-03
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.062 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.