IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Eagles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 50 14 27 41 0.820 0.3013 0.3099 0.8655 0.8903
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 27 7 21 28 1.037
2006-07 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 25 4 10 14 0.560
2005-06 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 26 6 13 19 0.731
2004-05 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 28 11 18 29 1.036
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2004-05 · Saint John's
+290.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13558
Forward overall
#438
Forward born in 1985
#546
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Lindauer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
R.J. Kleiman
Curry · 2008-09
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.