IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Holmgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — USHL 36 4 9 13 0.361 0.2299 0.2238 1.0821 1.0532
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 St. John's D3 — SR 28 2 15 17 0.607
2003-04 St. John's D3 — JR 27 4 23 27 1.000
2002-03 St. John's D3 — SO 19 6 16 22 1.158
2001-02 St. John's D3 — FR 9 2 3 5 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2001-02 · St. John's
+162.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3001
Defenseman overall
#500
Defenseman born in 1981
#2458
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hinz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Alaska
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.