IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erin Conway

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Choate NE-Prep-Girls 21 10 21 31 1.480 0.6809 0.6809 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC-W JR 29 4 7 11 0.379
2014-15 Brown D1 ECAC-W SO 20 3 3 6 0.300
2013-14 Brown D1 ECAC-W FR 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.63
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2013-14 · Brown
-30.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#256
Forward overall
#28
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.