IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carly Radovich

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 19 6 6 12 0.630 0.2899 0.2899 — —
2012-13 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 23 4 9 13 0.570 0.2623 0.2623 — —
2013-14 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 21 1 6 7 0.330 0.1518 0.1518 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SR 33 2 11 13 0.394
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA JR 28 6 15 21 0.750
2015-16 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SO 27 1 4 5 0.185
2014-15 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA FR 24 0 1 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2014-15 · Sacred Heart
-75.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3483
Forward overall
#248
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Antony
Minnesota ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.