← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver Rinne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-08-24 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Ilves U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2168 0.2486 0.6049 0.6935
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ RPI (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.