IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bailey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 11 11 8 19 1.727 0.1594 0.1662 0.3956 0.4124
2019-20 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 37 17 12 29 0.784 0.1025 0.1025 0.2660 0.2660
2020-21 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 42 26 18 44 1.048 0.1370 0.1370 0.3556 0.3556
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 30 2 4 6 0.200
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
100%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15346
Forward overall
#721
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Moy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Blake
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Connolly
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Iwanski
Hamilton · 2006-07
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.