IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Ahlgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 32 3 5 8 0.250 0.1592 0.1684 0.7492 0.7923
2013-14 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 35 7 10 17 0.486 0.1803 0.1886 1.4984 1.5145
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 60 20 25 45 0.750 0.2785 0.2767 0.7941 0.7891
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 — SR 24 2 13 15 0.625
2017-18 St. Thomas D3 — JR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2016-17 Bentley D1 AHA SO 28 1 5 6 0.214
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA FR 40 7 7 14 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · Bentley
+69.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19575
Forward overall
#762
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Matt Sieckhaus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Rein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2023-24
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Wynia
Fredonia · 2009-10
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.