IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bliss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 1 11 12 0.214 0.1662 0.1716 0.7976 0.8233
2013-14 — NTDP-U18 55 1 8 9 0.164 0.1269 0.1240 0.6089 0.5952
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 32 2 8 10 0.312
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 31 2 6 8 0.258
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2014-15 · Cornell
+91.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16259
Defenseman overall
#2078
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Raphael Robitaille
Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Power
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Fallon
SUNY Cortland · 2003-04
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.