IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raphael Robitaille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 12 14 26 0.481 0.1234 0.1337 0.3630 0.3933
2003-04 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 57 14 22 36 0.632 0.1618 0.1676 0.4761 0.4930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 29 10 19 29 1.000
2006-07 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 24 11 15 26 1.083
2005-06 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 29 14 24 38 1.310
2004-05 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 25 12 19 31 1.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.24
2004-05 · Norwich
+840.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32678
Forward overall
#1017
Forward born in 1985
#690
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matteo Viglino
New England College · 2022-23
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Holland
Utica · 2016-17
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2022-23
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.