IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raphael Robitaille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 12 14 26 0.481 0.1467 0.1589 0.3568 0.3866
2003-04 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 57 14 22 36 0.632 0.1924 0.1992 0.4681 0.4848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Norwich D3 — SR 29 10 19 29 1.000
2006-07 Norwich D3 — JR 24 11 15 26 1.083
2005-06 Norwich D3 — SO 29 14 24 38 1.310
2004-05 Norwich D3 — FR 25 12 19 31 1.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.24
2004-05 · Norwich
+691.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32482
Forward overall
#1001
Forward born in 1985
#849
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2022-23
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Sibold
Babson · 2020-21
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Dittrich
St. Olaf · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.