← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trenten Bennett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2006-04-01 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 4, Pick #99  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 27 9 10 89.6% 3.93 0 1.0008 86.0%
2024-25 CCHL 31 13 15 91.2% 2.92 3 0.9700 89.9%
2024-25 Owen Sound Attack OHL 6 1 4 92.3% 2.65 1 1.0008 92.0%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Chase Clark USHL 89.9% 86.4% Quinnipiac 84.0% 3.06
Marcus Brännman USHL 90.3% 86.6% Providence 75.0% 4.01
Remington Keopple USHL 89.3% 85.6% Cornell 85.2% 3.10
Melvin Strahl USHL 90.3% 86.4% Michigan State 92.2% 2.27
Axel Mangbo USHL 89.0% 85.4% Vermont 85.7% 5.00
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jackson Fellner SJHL 89.9% 86.4% Alvernia D3 92.4% 2.68
Carson Ironside AJHL 87.8% 86.2% Albertus Magnus D3 89.3% 2.76
Clément Labillois SJHL 88.9% 85.2% Assumption D2 93.6% 2.08
Chad Lowe USPHL-Premier 93.5% 88.6% SUNY Morrisville D3 90.2% 4.99
Chad Lowe USPHL-Premier 93.5% 88.6% Morrisville D3 90.2% 4.99

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.