icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Prince George Spruce Kings | BCHL | 2 | 0 | 1 | 84.8% | 3.71 | 0 | 0.9990 | 83.5% |
| 2025-26 | Bismarck Bobcats | NAHL | 15 | 9 | 2 | 89.2% | 3.16 | 1 | 0.9843 | 86.9% |
| 2024-25 | — | BCHL | 14 | 3 | 8 | 89.5% | 3.52 | 0 | 0.9990 | 90.6% |
| 2024-25 | — | NAHL | 14 | 8 | 4 | 90.1% | 2.44 | 3 | 0.9843 | 91.0% |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Robbins | USHL | 87.4% | 83.7% | Arizona State | 92.3% | 4.00 |
| Conor Callaghan | USHL | 88.4% | 84.5% | Princeton | 85.3% | 5.02 |
| Dylan Silverstein | USHL | 88.8% | 84.6% | Quinnipiac | 90.3% | 2.25 |
| Troy Kobryn | NCDC | 92.2% | 85.0% | Merrimack | 89.3% | 3.30 |
| Christian Manz | USHL | 88.0% | 83.7% | Augustana | 89.4% | 2.84 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Shantz | NA3HL | 89.7% | 82.9% | Plymouth State | D3 | 92.1% | 3.00 |
| Clément Labillois | SJHL | 88.9% | 85.2% | Assumption | D2 | 93.6% | 2.08 |
| Carson Ironside | AJHL | 87.8% | 86.2% | Albertus Magnus | D3 | 89.3% | 2.76 |
| Ford DeLoss | USPHL-Premier | 92.0% | 87.3% | Stevenson | D3 | 50.0% | 3.85 |
| Jackson Fellner | SJHL | 89.9% | 86.4% | Alvernia | D3 | 92.4% | 2.68 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.