← New Search ↗ Social Card

Calvin Vachon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2005-07-19 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 30 16 9 89.6% 2.62 1 0.9980 84.4%
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 38 22 12 90.2% 2.81 2 0.9980 91.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 9 2 6 89.7% 3.11 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Nathan Krawchuk OHL 90.1% 84.8% RPI 90.9% 2.82
Max Weilandt USHL 88.7% 83.8% Northern Michigan 87.0% 3.43
Brayden Gillespie OHL 88.1% 83.2% Union 91.5% 2.19
Jared Moe USHL 90.7% 85.9% Minnesota 91.5% 2.46
Jack Stark USHL 90.0% 84.4% Yale 91.9% 2.22
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Tyler Fromolz NA3HL 92.0% 87.1% Marian D3 88.3% 3.85
Jarret Bovarnick EHL 88.3% 87.8% Suffolk D3 87.2% 4.52
Ryan Kenny USPHL-Premier 93.5% 89.3% Stevenson D3 89.6% 2.95
Andrew Doran NA3HL 93.4% 87.1% Utica D3 100.0%
Zach Dosan NA3HL 92.1% 87.8% Gustavus Adolphus D3 72.5% 6.60

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.