IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kenny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — USPHL-Premier 19 12 6 93.5% 2.21 2 0.9400 86.7%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Stevenson D3 22 13 8 92.4% 2.23 2
2021-22 Stevenson D3 25 18 6 92.5% 2.39 —
2020-21 Stevenson D3 14 11 2 92.7% 2.00 0
2019-20 Stevenson D3 23 14 7 89.6% 2.95 2
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jacob Biron CCHL 90.9% 86.1% Army 92.3% 1.68
Jared Moe USHL 90.7% 85.9% Minnesota 91.5% 2.46
Freddie Halyk AJHL 91.0% 86.7% Denver 88.3% 2.91
Evan Fear USHL 90.8% 85.7% Quinnipiac 77.4% 6.56
Ryan Bischel USHL 90.5% 85.5% Notre Dame 91.5% 2.52
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Tyler Fromolz NA3HL 92.0% 87.1% Marian D3 88.3% 3.85
Jarret Bovarnick EHL 88.3% 87.8% Suffolk D3 87.2% 4.52
Zach Dosan NA3HL 92.1% 87.8% Gustavus Adolphus D3 72.5% 6.60
Andrew Doran NA3HL 93.4% 87.1% Utica D3 100.0% —
Michael Paterson-Jones USPHL-Premier 92.0% 88.7% Wilkes D3 89.5% 3.08

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.