← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Erickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 NAHL 25 8 10 91.8% 2.59 2 0.9843 87.9%
2023-24 NAHL 38 10 22 88.0% 3.99 1 0.9843 87.7%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Bentley D1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Klayton Knapp NAHL 92.1% 88.5% Minnesota Duluth 90.7% 2.67
Croix Kochendorfer NAHL 92.0% 88.4% Robert Morris 90.6% 2.95
John Hawthorne BCHL 91.8% 87.6% Northern Michigan 88.2% 3.10
Carson Dorfman NAHL 90.1% 86.6% RPI 100.0%
Gergely Orosz NAHL 91.9% 87.8% Alaska Anchorage 91.5% 2.75
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Cooper Lukenda NAHL 89.7% 88.3% St. Olaf D3 88.2% 3.91
Dario Cantini OJHL 89.8% 87.7% Lebanon Valley D3 86.1% 5.00
Tyler Roy EHL 91.3% 87.9% Neumann D3 87.2% 3.68
Ayden Pierce NCDC 91.1% 88.6% Misericordia D3 93.2% 2.87
Lochlan Lauer EHL 91.1% 88.7% Lebanon Valley D3 93.3% 2.24

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.