icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | — | NA3HL | 27 | 13 | 13 | 91.9% | 2.62 | 5 | 0.9400 | 77.9% |
| 2021-22 | — | NCDC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 90.1% | 3.10 | 0 | 0.9400 | 83.3% |
| 2021-22 | — | SJHL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 89.2% | 3.16 | 0 | 0.9700 | 84.7% |
| 2021-22 | — | AJHL | 4 | 0 | 2 | 74.6% | 7.64 | 0 | 0.9700 | 69.3% |
| 2019-20 | — | NAHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 11.43 | 0 | 0.9843 | 49.2% |
| 2019-20 | — | USHL | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9980 | — |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hamline | D3 | 18 | — | — | 87.1% | 3.80 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Tracy | USHL | 89.6% | 77.2% | Minnesota | 87.9% | 2.24 |
| Charles-Edward Gravel | QMJHL | 91.4% | 77.9% | Mercyhurst | 90.7% | 3.22 |
| Ryan Keyes | NCDC | 92.6% | 79.7% | Merrimack | 92.0% | 2.22 |
| Gavin Moffatt | USHL | 89.3% | 76.3% | Western Michigan | — | — |
| Chad Veltri | USHL | 90.2% | 78.3% | Niagara | 93.1% | 2.10 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dolan Gilbert | NA3HL | 91.0% | 78.2% | Concordia | D3 | 81.0% | 9.00 |
| Nolan Hildebrand | BCHL | 89.3% | 77.6% | Babson | D3 | 87.8% | 3.82 |
| Nolan Hildebrand | AJHL | 87.4% | 77.5% | Babson | D3 | 87.8% | 3.82 |
| Nicholas Von Kaufmann | OJHL | 88.9% | 79.9% | Marian | D3 | 88.6% | 3.25 |
| Dean Hahn | USPHL-Premier | 91.6% | 80.0% | Salem State | D3 | 88.9% | 3.95 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.