IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 40 8 7 15 0.375 0.2212 0.2237 1.1263 1.1392
2010-11 — USHL 48 7 4 11 0.229 0.1352 0.1299 0.6884 0.6615
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 30 3 5 8 0.267 0.1573 0.1438 0.8010 0.7324
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 27 19 29 48 1.778
2015-16 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 31 22 25 47 1.516
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 26 5 13 18 0.692
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 30 13 11 24 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2013-14 · SUNY Geneseo
+576.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33060
Forward overall
#1150
Forward born in 1991
#3048
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Bessing
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Bombardier
Trine · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.