← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 40 8 7 15 0.375 0.2388 0.2415 1.1238 1.1367
2010-11 USHL 48 7 4 11 0.229 0.1460 0.1403 0.6868 0.6600
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 30 3 5 8 0.267 0.1698 0.1553 0.7992 0.7307
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 SR 27 19 29 48 1.778
2015-16 SUNY Geneseo D3 JR 31 22 25 47 1.516
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 SO 26 5 13 18 0.692
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 FR 30 13 11 24 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2013-14 · SUNY Geneseo
+526.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23213
Forward overall
#909
Forward born in 1991
#3087
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.