← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxime Pellerin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 56 3 9 12 0.214 0.1066 0.1066 0.5715 0.5715
2020-21 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 26 4 3 7 0.269 0.1339 0.1339 0.7180 0.7180
2021-22 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 65 29 31 60 0.923 0.4592 0.4552 2.4619 2.4404
2022-23 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 68 40 46 86 1.265 0.6292 0.5929 3.3730 3.1785
2023-24 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 67 34 39 73 1.090 0.5421 0.4841 2.9060 2.5952
2024-25 McGill Univ. usports 26 10 15 25 0.962
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 35 10 13 23 0.657
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
+33.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4540
Forward overall
#128
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.