← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Savoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-14 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Concordia Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.1016 0.1016 0.5525 0.5525
2020-21 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 24 4 7 11 0.458 0.2252 0.2252 1.2238 1.2238
2021-22 QMJHL 49 3 7 10 0.204 0.1003 0.0989 0.5450 0.5376
2022-23 Québec Remparts QMJHL 64 10 24 34 0.531 0.2610 0.2447 1.4185 1.3299
2023-24 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 60 7 38 45 0.750 0.3685 0.3273 2.0027 1.7789
2024-25 Concordia Univ. USports-M 20 8 12 20 1.000 0.5276 0.5599 2.9310 3.1104
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SO 23 9 18 27 1.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.17
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+193.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8155
Forward overall
#323
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.