← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Labelle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Ottawa · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rockland Nationals CCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0542 0.0617 0.1934 0.2202
2019-20 Rockland Nationals CCHL 54 18 17 35 0.648 0.1406 0.1406 0.5014 0.5014
2020-21 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 14 3 12 15 1.071 0.5264 0.5264 2.8610 2.8610
2021-22 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 52 17 27 44 0.846 0.4157 0.4025 2.2596 2.1879
2022-23 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 65 27 42 69 1.062 0.5215 0.4794 2.8345 2.6059
2023-24 Univ. of Ottawa USports-M 21 2 9 11 0.524 0.2764 0.3016 1.5353 1.6750
2024-25 Univ. of Ottawa USports-M 15 7 6 13 0.867 0.4573 0.4770 2.5403 2.6496
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 30 3 7 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Bemidji State
-4.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8144
Forward overall
#386
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.