← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis-Philippe Fontaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0785 0.0785 0.4211 0.4211
2021-22 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 64 16 11 27 0.422 0.2098 0.2235 1.1252 1.1987
2022-23 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 63 28 28 56 0.889 0.4420 0.4492 2.3707 2.4096
2023-24 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 66 32 25 57 0.864 0.4294 0.4153 2.3032 2.2274
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 63 30 40 70 1.111 0.5524 0.5071 2.9633 2.7201
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA FR 30 10 11 21 0.700
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+73.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5751
Forward overall
#181
Forward born in 2004
#280
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.