← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Schultz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0330 0.0330 0.0759 0.0759
2021-22 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 67 2 22 24 0.358 0.1760 0.1870 0.9565 1.0163
2022-23 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 68 6 36 42 0.618 0.3034 0.3076 1.6492 1.6718
2023-24 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 67 9 48 57 0.851 0.4179 0.4030 2.2716 2.1906
2024-25 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 56 7 23 30 0.536 0.2632 0.2409 1.4305 1.3092
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 33 0 3 3 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2025-26 · Quinnipiac
-68.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2845
Defenseman overall
#660
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.