IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Johns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-04-18 Country: USA
2010 · Round 2, Pick #60  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 16 2 6 8 0.500 0.3716 0.3802 1.8657 1.9089
2009-10 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 3 16 19 0.306 0.2278 0.2209 1.1437 1.1090
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 40 8 12 20 0.500
2012-13 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig JR 41 1 13 14 0.342
2011-12 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig SO 37 4 6 10 0.270
2010-11 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig FR 44 2 11 13 0.295
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2010-11 · Notre Dame
+10.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4214
Defenseman overall
#755
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kero
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Wright
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.